Friday, November 27, 2009

CBC: We'll Report on ClimateGate...Reluctantly, At the Bottom of the Web Page and Leaving Out Most Damning Facts

Agenda journalism at its finest.


  1. The CBC finally gets around to talking about it... a week later. And here's their headline: Hackers skewed climate-change emails: scientists

    Canadian red journalism at it's finest.

  2. I think the internet should be bannedd for you cons! You are using it to make up lies and for those lies you will pay!! The Liberals know the truth and have shown you the truth but you do not listen! These new lies mean nothing and Ignatieff will make you sorry for your lies!

  3. luber liberal here is a summary of the emails

    ■Mann tells Jones that it would be nice to '"contain" the putative Medieval Warm Period'.
    ■Tom Wigley tells Jones that the land warming since 1980 has been twice the ocean warming and that this might be used by sceptics as evidence for urban heat islands.
    ■Kevin Trenberth says they can't account for the lack of recent warming and that it is a travesty that they can't.
    ■Tim Osborn discusses how data are truncated to stop an apparent cooling trend showing up in the results
    ...and it goes on and on and on ... Global warming is a lie luber get over it.

  4. I think uber liberal is a conservative just playing around.

  5. Why would you call me a con? I did not call you names. That's why you should be banned because of your lies!! There are already to many cons out and there and I would not be one.

  6. So Iggy is going to make us all sorry for our horrid ways?? Are you twelve? OOOHHHhhh I'm scared. Uber..say after me..sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me. For the record, Liberals wrote the book on lying and character assasination. It's all you know how to do. Poor child.

  7. The ombudsman probably made them do this story, but it is so biased and gone from their page as quickly as possible.

  8. I went to the CBC site and read Bob Mcdonalds article. I note that he actually stated, " .... climate science stands on a firm footing of rigorous research and appropriately skeptical peer review". I cannot believe that he wrote that after reading the CRU archive. He, rather obviously, had not bothered to read the CRU e-mail archive or the informed comment on blogs. Frankly, "Peer review " looks like becoming a popular punchline for a bad joke.